Ann Landers (via quotedojo)
I am so glad I pressed play
I’M LAUGHING SO HARD I’M CRYING
This was a religious experience I wanna give this woman a hand shake
This is white supremacy.
Um this whole gofundme shit is like a reward on Mike Brown’s head. FUCK THAT.
Considering that he’s in hiding because of the death threats, I would call it a good cause. I have seen enough evidence to consider it self defense.
Judge, juror, and executioner. Sounds exactly like the thinking of a cop.
I am simply stating my opinion. Am I not allowed to have an opinion?
You certainly can have an opinion Donald Sterling, but you cannot expect to be exempt from being ostracized for the ridiculousness of it.
Here is a good explanation of the shooting:
Here’s some info about police shootings:
It’s also proven that it’s uncontrollable to fire 1-2 extra shots after the threat is gone because your brain has not processed that yet. I do not have a link but I know it is by the Force Science Institute(this would explain the shot to the top of the head).
Still think he was shot in the back? Or are you going to deny the evidence?P.S. I love how you’re calling me a racist…
This “breakdown,” if you can call it that, is complete garbage. If you know anything about evidentiary arguments you’d know that everything he is using to rebuild the scene to bolster his argument is hearsay, as he is literally going off third party conversations.
He is hardly an expert just because he is a former marine. Further, his credibility beyond expertise is shit, considering the bias of the evidence he is willing to use in his reconstruction. Rather than using a publication like the NY Times, which I don’t care for either for other reasons, he’d rather use a telephone call he cannot verify the authenticity of, which, in turn, we cannot verify directly that the conversation spoke about in this conversation ever took place without Wilson’s admission.
But his reason for not using the NY times is gold: “The New York Times cannot possibly be trusted on, well, on anything. Their left-leaning, Christian-hating, communist-loving bias has been evident for years and decades.”
Yea, great unbiased analysis buddy, not that anything needs to be unbiased when ANOTHER white cops kills an unarmed black child, it’s just that the bias you’re couching yourself in is white supremacist to the core. But, like I’ve said before, most racists don’t even know they’re racist, no matter what your intentions. One of the most sinister things about normalized racism is you don’t have to have bad intentions to be racist, you just have to remain ignorant.
And by ignorant I mean you seem pretty oblivious to the greater discussion of police brutality in communities of color being had here.
Ok then prove that he wasn’t running at him. Just do it. Provide sources with expert witnesses to analyze the evidence.
Why? That’s playing your game. That’s letting you control the narrative. Fuck that. How about this:
We know Mike Brown was unarmed.
We know Darren Wilson made a choice.
We know that choice was to pull a gun on an unarmed Mike Brown.
We know Darren Wilson’s choice was to fire on an unarmed Mike Brown.
We know that 6 bullets fired from Darren Wilson’s gun penetrated Mike Brown’s body.
We know these wounds inflicted by Darren Wilson’s choice to fire KILLED Mike Brown.
We know Darren Wilson could have gotten back in his squad car and left.
We know Darren Wilson could have called back up.
We know Darren Wilson could have chosen not to fire his weapon.
We know Darren Wilson did not make that choice.
We know Mike Brown is dead not only because of the choice Darren Wilson made, but also because of the choices Darren Wilson could have made but did not.
The real question you and every other cop loving fuck don’t like hearing is when, if ever, does a cop have justification to shoot and kill and an unarmed civilian?
The correct answer is never.
The problem is cops know they can shoot now and ask questions later, because when the questions are asked later a system of white supremacy will protect them because in a system of white supremacy black lives don’t matter.
(Images should be read from the bottom, up.)
GoFundMe is allowing a campaign for people to donate money to Darren Wilson, the cop who killed Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO.
When called on this, and how it violates their ToS, GoFundMe’s response was to delete the hateful, disgusting, racist comments from the donations. They refused to end the campaign. Apparently it is only “promoting hate, violence, racial intolerance, or the financial exploitation of a crime” if people can see the deplorable sentiments behind the donations. Somehow deleting the evidence of those sentiments magically changes what those donations are for: rewarding a police officer for killing Michael Brown.
This is absolutely a direct violation of GoFundMe’s ToS, yet GoFundMe is refusing to act. These are people giving money to an individual that gunned down an unarmed black teen. He is profiting from this killing, and it directly promotes racial intolerance and violence. There is no reason why GoFundMe should allow this campaign to continue…
… Except that GoFundMe gets 5% of the cut. In this case, 5% of 235k is $12,500. GoFundMe and Darren Wilson both are profiting off the killing of Michael Brown, and GoFundMe has decided they’d rather take their cut of the money than follow their own ToS. $12,500 is apparently what it takes to abandon justice.
Please, join in the boycott of GoFundMe, and consider signal boosting this.
Go fund me has done other shitty things as well.
deidara’s butthole is most likely just another mouth
The explanation for this gap is simple. In Britain, guns are rare. Only specialist firearms officers carry them; and criminals rarely have access to them. The last time a British police officer was killed by a firearm on duty was in 2012, in a brutal case in Manchester. The annual number of murders by shooting is typically less than 50. Police shootings are enormously controversial. The shooting of Mark Duggan, a known gangster, which in 2011 started riots across London, led to a fiercely debated inquest. Last month, a police officer was charged with murder over a shooting in 2005. The reputation of the Metropolitan Police’s armed officers is still barely recovering from the fatal shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes, an innocent Brazilian, in the wake of the 7/7 terrorist bombings in London.
In America, by contrast, it is hardly surprising that cops resort to their weapons more frequently. In 2013, 30 cops were shot and killed—just a fraction of the 9,000 or so murders using guns that happen each year. Add to that a hyper-militarised police culture and a deep history of racial strife and you have the reason why so many civilians are shot by police officers. Unless America can either reduce its colossal gun ownership rates or fix its deep social problems, shootings of civilians by police—justified or not—seem sure to continue.
Armed police: Trigger happy | The Economist (via kenyatta)
once in the 4th grade this guy got a 2% on his math quiz so everyone called him milk for the rest of the year
So I made a thing
this is on a whole new level of patience
This is natural art.